New User!
Gays and the Military
Imprint: Princeton University Press
Format: Adobe Encrypted (DRM)
Earn $0.50 - Write a Review »
In April 1987 Joseph C. Steffan, one of the ten highest ranking midshipmen in his class at the U.S. Naval Academy, and only six weeks from graduation, was denied his diploma and forced to resign his commission because he answered "Yes, sir" to the question, "I'd like your word, are you a homosexual?" Six years later his cause, and that of other gay men and lesbians seeking to serve their country by enlistment in the military, has become the subject of intense national controversy. This unusual and innovative work, based on the litigation strategy and court papers filed in the case of Joseph C. Steffan v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense, et al. , brings the resources of clinical psychiatry, clinical and social psychology, cultural history and political science to bear upon the fundamental questions at issue: How is sexual orientation determined? How and why have socially prejudiced stereotypes about male and female homosexuals developed? Why have gays faced special obstacles in defending themselves against discrimination? How much political power do gays have?
Marc Wolinsky and Kenneth Sherrill argue that gays constitute a politically powerless class that has been unjustly deprived of its constitutional right to equal protection under the law. They have collected here the affidavits filed on behalf of Joseph Steffan in his suit against the United States government, together with the counter-arguments of the Department of Defense and the extraordinary opinion of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Whatever the outcome of the case, presently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, this book will stand as a lasting and indispensable guide to the sources of sexual discrimination.
Share your thoughts on the Gays and the Military Social Science eBook with others!
| Title of eBook: Gays and the Military | |
| Release Date: 09-07-1993 | |
| Publisher: Princeton University Press |
This eBook download is available in the following formats:
| Parent title | Gays and the Military |
|---|---|
| Encrypted (DRM) | Yes |
| SKU | 9781400821044 |
| File size | 2405 |
| Security | n/a |
| Printing | Not allowed |
| Copying | Not allowed |
| Read aloud | No Sys requirements Download reader |
| Devices | Samsung Tablet, Apple Ipad & Iphone, Barnes & Noble Nook, Kobo eReader, Aluratek Libre, Iliad, Nokia, Blackberry, Hanlin |
| Note | Excellent navigation features are available via Adobe such as bookmarks and a quick access table of contents. Text search is easily accessible. An Adobe DRM-protected file is different than a pdf file in that it uses Adobe DRM (Digital Rights Management) technology, which authors and publishers use to protect their content from illegal online distribution and to set certain privileges such as restrictions on copying and printing. |
Gays and the Military
Chapter One
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & KatzBRIEF OF JOSEPH STEFFAN
Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs Cross-motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
THIS memorandum of law is respectfully submitted on behalf of plaintiff Joseph C. Steffan in support of his cross-motion for summary judgment and in opposition to defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, summary judgment.
Preliminary Statement
In the spring of 1987, plaintiff Joseph C. Steffan was a model midshipman at the United States Naval Academy. Selected to be a battalion commander in his senior year, he was six weeks away from graduation when a promising career in service to his country was abruptly terminated. This unfortunate and unnecessary result came about because Steffan remained true to the United States Naval Academy honor code and truthfully answered "Yes, sir" when he was asked, "I'd like your word, are you a homosexual?" No one ever claimed that Steffan's sexual orientation interfered with his performance at the Academy or his three summer tours of military duty. And no one ever claimed that Steffan engaged in homosexual conduct, in or out of uniform, on or of duty.
For purposes of the Navy's regulations, Steffan's character and record of service are all irrelevant. All that is relevant is Steffan's status as a homosexual, a status that is an intrinsic part of his makeup, as intrinsic as his race or hair color. In the defendants' eyes,
...








